The Free House Weekly

The week’s trade news that matters, every Friday. Free.

FreeOfTie – Free of Tie: pub trade news and resources, for the free house
FreeOfTie

News & know-how for the free house

This week on the hub

0 pubs to let0 suppliers0 jobs

A 10% VAT rate for hospitality: would it save pubs, or just disappear?

The Budget left VAT at 20% and the campaign for a 10% hospitality rate goes on. Supporters say it would mean jobs, investment and lower prices. The Treasury says it would cost about £10.5bn a year, and the evidence from the 2020 cut is mixed. Here’s the case on both sides.

Burger and chips next to a pint of beer, with the word VAT and sales charts in the background

Where things stand

The standard rate of VAT stays at 20% for 2027/28, and the registration threshold stays at £90,000. The 28 October Budget didn’t include the cut the trade had campaigned for.

UKHospitality’s main Budget ask was to cut VAT to 10% for hospitality. It argued that this would bring the UK closer to its international competitors and give businesses “the headroom to invest, create jobs and keep prices down”. The BII backed it too. Its chief executive, Steve Alton, said after the Budget that bringing VAT “in line with other European countries” was “the simplest and most impactful step”. UKHospitality’s Allen Simpson said: “We must carry on going to win the VAT cut we so badly need.”

The case for

Operators say they’d reinvest it. In a survey by the trade bodies in February, carried out by CGA by NIQ with operators of more than 20,000 sites, 89% backed a VAT reduction. Asked what they’d prioritise if their tax burden came down, 70% said refurbishing and developing existing sites, 46% said creating new jobs and 27% said opening new sites.

The campaign’s own modelling says it pays for itself over time. UKHospitality’s published case draws on a study commissioned by the Cut Tourism & Hospitality VAT campaign. That study estimated 182,400 jobs over five years, £7.7bn of extra sector sales over ten years and a net gain to the Treasury of £4.6bn over ten years. Two caveats. That modelling was for a 12.5% rate, not 10%, and it was commissioned by campaigners.

The jobs need is real. UKHospitality says nearly 100,000 hospitality jobs have gone in the past two years, and calls hospitality the biggest employer of young people.

The case against, or at least for caution

The cost is large. In March, the Treasury minister Lord Livermore said HMRC estimates that cutting VAT to 10% on all accommodation and food and beverage services would cost £10.5bn in 2026/27. Any Chancellor has to find that money somewhere else.

Customers may not see much of it. From July 2020, the UK temporarily cut VAT on hospitality food, soft drinks and accommodation to 5%, before restoring it in stages by April 2022. Alcohol wasn’t included. The evidence on what happened to prices is not encouraging for anyone hoping for cheaper menus:

Does “disappearing” mean wasted?

This is where the two sides talk past each other. If a VAT cut doesn’t lower prices, the money doesn’t vanish. It stays in the business. In 2020 that meant survival. In 2027 it might mean repairing margins, paying wage rises or putting off a price increase. That’s the campaign’s point: the cut buys “headroom”, not necessarily a cheaper pint.

The honest answer to the question in the headline is that it depends on what you want the cut to do. If the aim is lower prices for customers, the 2020 evidence suggests most of the saving wouldn’t reach them. If the aim is to keep viable pubs open and staffed, a cut that mostly stays in the business may be doing exactly what the trade asked for. Whether that’s worth £10.5bn of public money is a political judgement, and one this government hasn’t been willing to make.

Two things to bear in mind

  • Wet sales. The 2020 cut didn’t apply to alcohol. Whether any future cut would is up to the Chancellor. It’s worth knowing which version the campaigns are asking for before you sign up to the argument.
  • Plan on 20%. There’s no announced change, so price and budget on the current rate.

Our take

The case for a hospitality VAT cut is strongest when it’s argued as what it is: support for viable businesses carrying a heavy tax load. It’s weakest when it’s sold as a promise of cheaper food and drink, because the evidence from the last cut doesn’t back that up.

Sources (10)

The Free House Weekly

The week’s trade news for free-of-tie publicans, in one Friday email. Free.

Previous
Next

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *